Sunday, April 22, 2012

Information Graphics: A Vareity of Perspectives

A philosophical introduction: The Society of the Spectacle, by Guy Debord

The idea of the degradation of human life governed much of Guy Debord's writings in, The Society of the Spectacle. According to Wikipedia, Debord argues that social life can be seen as, "the decline of being into having, and having into merely appearing." Although very dense and challenging material to navigate, Debord offers a unique perspective on modern society, and his notion of 'the spectacle':
"The spectacle, like modern society itself, is at once united and divided. The unity of each is based on violent divisions. But when this contradiction emerges in the spectacle, it is itself contradicted by a reversal of its meaning: the division it presents is unitary, while the unity it presents is divided." (Chapter 3, Sec. 54)
Throughout the text, when Debord uses the word 'spectacle', he is referring to the mass media, our consumer economy or sometimes our advanced systems of government (Wikipedia). Debord wrote, about the notion of the spectacle stemming of our consumer oriented "economy of abundance." He claimed that products of the over-abundant economy dominate the market, or the spectacle. 

An example of information graphics in publishing:

In the opening of The Virtual Window: From Alberti to Microsoft, by Anne Friedberg, she declares:
"As we spend more of our time staring into the frames of movies, television, computers, hand-held displays--"windows" full of moving images, text, icons, and 3D graphics--how the world is framed may be as important as what is contained within that frame."
The Vectors Journal Editorial Staff praise Friedberg's expansive survey of visual culture over the past 500 years and suggest that her work offers an opportunity to think deeply about the entangled forces that contribute to the evolution of technologies of vision. Friedberg collaborated with Erik Loyer to develop an interactive counterpart for her book called, "The Virtual World Interactive." Friedberg, with the help of Loyer, constructed enactments of the critical concepts she discusses in her work. One of the central tenants of the book is the paradigm of the "split optic" which she defines as a form of parallel vision that views the past and present simultaneously. The Vectors Journal writes, "The Virtual World Interactive' invites us to think critically about the past in light of present sensibilities, while using the past as a vehicle for thinking critically about the present." For instance, at one point, a user can watch excerpts from I Love Lucy in the frame of a Renaissance era stained glass window. And that is only one example of Friedberg's eclectic range of sources and ideas. The Vectors Journal concludes that this kind of constantly-shifting and expanding design technique is arguably the most powerful development of digital publishing.

Big ideas about a small design feature: The dashed line in all its glory

Timo (2006) published his ideas about "The dash line in use" to Touch, a research project that investigates specific technologies, namely the technology that enables connections between mobile phones and physical things. Timo expresses his affinity for the dashed line in information graphics and design. He claims there is no tool more effective to illustrate borders or seams. Although it emerged from the designer's shorthand and from the limitations of printing techniques, the dashed line has "a simple visual magic, the ability to express something three- or four-dimensional in two dimensions." The interactive article incorporates examples from over fifty years of information design history. Timo references the dashed line as a hidden geometry, as an expectation, as border or seams, and as used in instructional design. Colin Ware (1999, as cited in Timo, 2006) defined the dashed, dotted or wavy lines as linking lines. He said that linking lines between things indicate a relationship between them. Adjusting the waviness or colors of the line can represent an attribute or type of relationship. The dash line can be seen as movement, indicating temporal positions of things. Similarly, it can be used to represent the path itself (Timo, 2006).

Information graphics in daily life: A personal reflection

Have graphics and design become more important than simple text itself? The internet itself is one large information graphic. Its one giant graphic design project, an infinite work-in-progress of visualization. We are not simply reading black text on white HTML pages. We are digesting the design of the information as well as the presented ideas themselves. Its all about the presentation. 

We are visualizing the information through its design; we do not just read words, we have design-literate as well. In a single skim of a website we see the font, text size, headline, spacing, icons, photographs, and captions. Without it? We would blow it off and move onto the next page. We subconsciously search for information with sophistication. Website credibility is held to a high design standard. In fact, we have become so info-graphic savvy that we respond to icons instantly. We read icons and graphics as if they are words. The iPhone home screen is a platform of icons. We have ascribed names, words and meaning to each app (and thus, icon) downloaded from the Apple AppStore.

What would the Iphone home screen be like if it used words instead of icons or graphics? It wouldn't be half as sleek and appealing. The lack of text adds a level of sophistication to the device. Below is an example of how chaotic my Iphone home screens would appear if they used words rather than information graphics. (Create your own word cloud here!)



Through its use of information graphics, we feel tech savvy by simply using it, navigating the home screen pages and knowing how each icon operates. And that fact that we can personalize these screens to our satisfaction makes us information graphic snobs. And that's not a bad thing. In fact, its respectable.


That everyone can identify what all of those icons mean? We like that. But no denying that the information graphics/icons that make up the commands of the internet and social media application or website exist because of fundamental words and language. The icon cannot exist without words that give it meaning, otherwise it would just be a "graphic" rather than a graphic with information. 

Designing relevant information graphics for future projects:
Marti Trewe contributed an article on the matter to the AGBeat blog, a site centering on business intelligence content. Trewe reviews and summarizes Piktochart and 16 other do-it-yourself information graphic generators online for the busy business professional. Its a fascinating article documenting why some infographics dazzle the audience and others just flop. Check out the list here and consider them for future presentations in the academic or business world:

 
Image source: see article reference below, screen shot of page


Sources:



Editors and Friedberg, Anne (2007) ‘The Virtual Window Interactive’ Vectors, 2(2)

'The Society of the Spectacle,' Wikipedia

Trewe, Marti, 'Piktochart: simple infographic creator online for the busy professional,' AGBeat 

Monday, April 16, 2012

Piracy (vs. Privacy): Part 2 of 2

Privacy vs. Piracy. Both boil down to one concern: regulating the internet. To control or not control the online world. Ideas, research and reflections. 

piracy  |ˈpīrəsē|  noun.
1. File sharing software like BitTorrent and others that enable individuals to download movies, songs, and other creative works without paying for them. Lecture Notes, Week 6
2. The practice of attacking and robbing ships at sea. A similar practice in other contexts, esp. hijacking : air piracy.
3. The unauthorized use, reproduction of, or appropriation of patented and/or copyrighted material : software piracy.
 
SYNONYMS: Freebooting, bootlegging, copying, illegal, plagiarism, infringement, robbery
Other definition information found at Dictionary.com

Well geez, when you put it like that I want to avoid admitting that I've ever downloaded something without authorization... but if everyone is a 'pirate' then what's the big deal?

The ubiquitous nature of piracy: A personal reflection on illegal downloading and other internet crimes we have all committed

I get it. Piracy is bad. It has been equated with the word 'hijacking.' Don't do it to avoid being considered a cyber-terrorist. Blah blah blah. Similar to underage drinking in the United States, can something this ubiquitos truly be a crime? Not only is everyone doing it but society is making it easy. If drinking before the age of 21 really is illegal in the States, then wouldn't there be cops in every college campus bar and strict fake ID scanners at every liquor store/restaurant/club entrance. I know damn well my friends and I looked about 15 when we started using our first fake IDs at the beginning of college. But really, where is the law enforcement? For every minor that gets busted for drinking under the age limit, the other ten thousand high-school kids across the country are not. For ever pirate busted for illegal downloading, the other five billions people on the planet are not.

In effort to make my point, I will rat out two personal favorite pirating websites. They may not be directly in violation of copyright law but they make redistribution of the song/movie doable and therefore they are the platform for the crime. If piracy, bootlegging, creativity-hijacking yadda yadda is so illegal, then explain why these websites have not been shut down... Channel 131 and YouTube video to MP3 File. And those are just two of the millions that exist like it...

If illegal downloading is SO illegal. Then prove it. Control it. Everyone understands the negative implications around it... the artist don't receiving their fair profit, the creators don't obtain the credit they deserve. Valid points, I agree with that. But when I'm downloading Usher's new hit single from YouTube, converting it to an MP3 file and sending it to my iTunes Library... the farthest thing from my mind is the 0.99 cents that I'm depriving Usher, the billionaire rap artist of earning.

But the government is not as concerned with people like me who merely flirt with the legality of piracy but more so with the trained, tech experts who could hijack an entire network within seconds. There is no way to count, let alone monitor, the astronomical number of websites on the internet. And if the sites themselves cannot be regulated than there is no way in hell that the information downloaded from them can be controlled. But there lies the most fundamental tenet of the internet. Its a free domain. The fact that piracy so easily happens is why the internet exists as such a brilliant network of knowledge, ideas, and people. Because its free. Because its completely open as a shared space.

But that's just it. "Almost impossible to control" are the exact words used to define 'bootlegging' (a synonym and close cousin of piracy). So where is the line drawn? How open can copyrighted information be if its on the internet? How limitless can the web become? Perhaps piracy is its border? Maybe we have found it's boundaries, a limit to the infinite online world. Since internet access has become a focal point of human life in developed countries, we cannot simply ignore the implications of piracy any longer. Something has to be done and I have no idea what will happen next.

George Monbiot, published in the Guardian in December 2010, wrote:
"The internet is a remarkable gift, which has granted us one of the greatest democratic opportunities since universal suffrage. We’re in danger of losing this global commons as it comes under assault from an army of trolls and flacks, many of them covertly organised or trained. The question for all of us – the Guardian, other websites, everyone who benefits from this resource – is what we intend to do about it. It’s time we fought back and reclaimed the internet for what it does best: exploring issues, testing ideas, opening the debate."
But if we reclaim the internet, that means rules and regulations. The freedom of the platform will vaporize quickly with each piece of legislation. If legislation can even be approved... United States Representative, Lamar Smith, from Texas, introduced a bill that yielded a multitude of backlash, called the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). Check this out for more information on SOPA. The future of SOPA is still in progress and will undoubtedly be an issue in the upcoming US presidential election.

Two sides to the SOPA story:
Paulo Coelho, successful author and writer, captured an interesting perspective on the legislation through posting his thoughts to his personal blog. His bottom line: There is real danger backing SOPA; if the act is made into law, it will affect the whole planet. Coelho begins by saying, "From the Gospels to political manifestos, literature has allowed ideas to travel and even change the world." One would assume an author to be in defense of intellectual property but that is not the case for Coelho. He says the more people 'pirate' a book, the better. He compares it to the way we hear songs on a radio; the more we hear the song, the more apt we are to buy the track. Coelho claims that the same goes with literature. He concluded his thoughts in saying, 
"Pirating can act as an introduction to an artist's work. If you like his or her idea, then you will want to have [the real thing] in your house; a good idea doesn't need protection. The rest is either greed or ignorance."

So... can we have the best of both worlds? Can we have a free, unregulated internet with no restrictions of copyright? Is piracy truly impossible to control? It seems that piracy will exist as long as the internet remains a free, open and accessible commons.

It also seems that I am completely torn between the two sides of the issue... 
But then again, who isn't?

Sources:
Coelho, Paulo, "My thoughts on SOPA," Paulo Coelho's blog accessed via http://www.diigo.com/user/andersand/SOPA

Hildyard, Nicholas, Lohmann, Larry, Sexton, Sarah and Fairlie, Simon (1995) ‘Reclaiming the Commons’ The Corner House

Monbiot, George (2010) ‘Reclaim the Cyber-Commons’, Monbiot.com

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SOPA

Sunday, April 15, 2012

Privacy (vs. Piracy): Part 1 of 2

Privacy vs. Piracy. Both boil down to one concern: regulating the internet. To control or not control the online world. Ideas, research and reflections.

privacy  |ˈprīvəsē|  noun.
1. The state or condition of being free from being observed or disturbed by other people.
2. The state of being free from public attention.
3. The condition of being secret; secrecy.
 
SYNONYMS: seclusion, solitude, isolation, freedom from disturbance, freedom from interference.
Other definition information found at Dictionary.com

When was the last time you checked your privacy settings on Twitter? When was the last time you opted out of tracking? When was the last time you cared? Most people react to these questions with their own confusion... "Am I supposed to care about that?" You decide...

"Every time you visit a site that has a follow button, a 'tweet' button or a hover-card, Twitter is recording your behavior. It is transparently watching your movements and storing them somewhere for later use," explained Dustin Curtis in his blog post about Twitter's sneaky tracking methods.
For the time being, that data is collected for the tweeter's personal benefit; it is used to make more relevant suggestions for other accounts you might want to follow. Curtis wonders what other things that data could be used for. He says, "The privacy implications of such behavior by a company so large are sweeping and absolute."

Curtis urges all of us to ask ourselves the same questions he wonders about:
  • If tracking your behavior transparently is acceptable in the pursuit of a better user experience, why isn't it also acceptable in the pursuit of monetization? 
  • Is it okay for Twitter to sell your web browsing history to advertisers?
  • How many people have access to the data Twitter is collecting? 
  • Can any Twitter employee who has production database access look at Mitt Romney's browsing history? Can they look at your browsing history?
Curtis said he is not surprised that Twitter, and almost certainly Facebook, are partaking in this kind of data collection, but doesn't agree with it. Curtis declares that this activity is a violation of privacy and trust. The data is not only being collected but stored and re-distributed. And even though Twitter, and Facebook (and other social media power houses) outline their privacy policies extensively, their word choice is a careful science created to reaffirm your safety but still leave room for transparency.

Earlier this year, Twitter amended its privacy policy, agreeing to abide by its host nation's laws. 
Forbes contributor, Erik Kain, refers to  Jeff Bercovi's insight on the topic. Bercovi said, "Twitter's helping France and Turkey clamp down on free speech without inconveniencing users in other countries."

Kain and Bercovi agree that this form of tailored privacy is not brand new and hardly unprecedented. Google has been blocking search results in China for years. But that's not the real issue of concern. Kain says that the real problem is the implications Twitter's new privacy policies have on governments and countries as a whole. Kain references John Villasenor of UCLA who wrote, "For the first time ever, it will be technologically and financially feasible for authoritarian governments to record nearly everything that is said or done within their borders."

On one hand, there is safety to consider. Kain cites Villasenor again arguing, "Pervasive monitoring will provide what amounts to a time machine allowing authoritarian government to perform retrospective surveillance." In other words, it will be possible to go back in time to examine phone records, bank statements, online activity etc. to compile a file of all events and transactions leading up to criminal's arrest.


But not everyone is a criminal and shouldn't be "tweeted" as such. Kain reminds us, like any powerful tool that dominates humanity, technology is an especially sharp double-edge sword

Sources: 
Coelho, Paulo, "My thoughts on SOPA," Paulo Coelho's blog accessed via http://www.diigo.com/user/andersand/SOPA

Curtis, Dustin, "Twitter is tracking you on the web" accessed via http://www.diigo.com/user/andersand/privacy
 
Kain, Erik, "Twitter censorship and the future of authoritarianism in a high-tech world," Forbes
accessed via http://www.diigo.com/user/andersand/censorship